Legal Opinion

Conklyn v. Shenandoah Milling Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

■ Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County. Action by Magnus C'onklyn and others against the Shenandoah Milling Mompany. Decree for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE:

The object of the bill in this cause is specific performance of a contract and sale of real estate with an abatement from the purchase money, on account of failure of the vendor to insure a building, constituting part of the purchase, which was destroyed by fire after the contract was made. Relief was denied the plaintiffs, their bill dismissed and a decree entered against them for $1,654.50, the balance of the purchase money.-

The property consisted of about fourteen acres oí land on which there was a water power grist mill, a dwelling house and *569out buildings. Intending to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shrewsbury v. TuftsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Armstrong v. RossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Scraggs v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Frye v. MileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Titchenell v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peerless Carbon Black Co. v. GillespieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Watson-Loy Coal Co. v. Monroe Coal Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Dickinson v. FosterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API