Legal Opinion

Trammell v. City of Roanoke

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1930No. 5 Div. 787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

In passing upon a request for the general affirmative charge, the court must consider the entire evidence, both for the plaintiff and defendant. If, after doing so, the evidence is without conflict, the question is one for the court. Cohen v. State, 16 Ala. App. 522, 79 So. 621; Cook v. State, 17 Ala. App. 611, 88 So. 58.

The evidence without dispute is that, upon a search being made, some whjsky was found, in a keg in the back room of the house where defendant lived with his wife; that the whisky was bought and placed there by the wife, without the knowledge or consent of defendant; that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gassenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Cohen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Cook v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cope v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Veasy v. City of Phenix CityAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API