Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Calypso Veneer Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1956No. 308PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

92 S.E.2d 435 (1956)

244 N.C. 1

Eugenia SCARBOROUGH, Vivian Scarborough and William S. Scarborough

v.

CALYPSO VENEER COMPANY.

No. 308.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 1956.

Jones, Reed & Griffin, Kinston, for plaintiffs, appellants.

James N. Smith, Goldsboro, for defendant, appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The plaintiffs' only assignment of error is based on their exception to the judgment of nonsuit. The real controversy arose over provision (g) of the timber deed and whether the defendant had violated that provision by cutting over the land, or at least substantial parts of it, a second time.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Sheets v. . WalshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Davis v. . FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Hardison v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RiddlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API