Legal Opinion

Arkansas Natural Gas Company v. Sealy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The sole ground upon which the judgment is sought to be reversed is that the evidence is not legally sufficient to warrant the verdict.

The evidence for the defendant, as well as for the plaintiff, shows that it is very dangerous to work in oil and gas fields. Indeed, it is a scientific fact of which the court will take judicial notice, that natural gas is so inflammable that, the moment a flame is applied to it, it will immediately ignite with an instant explosion. Holmberg v. Jacobs (Ore.), Ann. Cas. 1917D, p. 496; Jamieson v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. American Railway Express Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Railway Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  4. Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arkansas Mining Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API