Kerr v. State ex rel. Wray

Two errors are assigned in this case: first, the insufficiency of the complaint; second, the sustaining of the demurrer of the relator to the answer of the appellant.

The complaint alleges that Wray had sued one Sangster, in the circuit court; that there was a trial by jury, verdict *289for the defendant, motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment rendered; that a bill of exceptions was filed and an appeal prayed and allowed to this court; that the plaintiff, Wray, then filed his petition to be allowed to prosecute said action as a poor person; that the court granted the prayer of said…