Legal Opinion

Torres v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied.

Although plaintiffs assailants in this premises security case remain unidentified, plaintiff has raised a triable issue of fact as to whether it was “more likely or more reasonable than not” that the assailants were intruders “who gained access to the premises through a negligently maintained entrance” (Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 NY2d 544, 548).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivera v. 1652 Popham Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Reynolds v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API