Torres v. New York City Housing Authority
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied.
Although plaintiffs assailants in this premises security case remain unidentified, plaintiff has raised a triable issue of fact as to whether it was “more likely or more reasonable than not” that the assailants were intruders “who gained access to the premises through a negligently maintained entrance” (Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 NY2d 544, 548).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rivera v. 1652 Popham Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Reynolds v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000