Allendale Mutual Insurance v. Triple-S Technologies, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
The matter before the Court is third-party Securitec, Inc.’s amended motion to dismiss the third-party complaint. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) provides that if the Court considers evidence presented beyond the pleadings, the motion should be considered one for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. In this case, the parties have presented and the Court has reviewed evidentiary documents beyond the pleadings. In addition, the parties have had adequate opportunity to present all material pertinent to a Rule 56 motion. Accordingly, I have reviewed the motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Maseda v. Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Donald R. Brock, Clinical Biotest Laboratories, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Consolidated Biomedical Laboratories, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- VICTORY LANE QUICK OIL CHANGE, INC. v. HossDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Ploeg v. Jenkins Estates LTDDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025