Legal Opinion
Searls v. Loring
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract to recover the balance due on a written contract and for extra work. No question is raised as to the extras. The declaration is upon an account annexed. The first item in that account is “Balance on contract for heating and plumbing work $125.00.” The answer of the defendant contained a gen*405eral denial. It also set out that there was a contract between the parties whereby the plaintiff agreed to furnish the labor and materials declared upon in item 1 of the account annexed to his declaration, and that in various particulars there was failure on the part of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Bowen v. KimbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Gillis v. CobeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Cullen v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Biggs v. DensmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Russo v. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Zarthar v. SalibaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Sherman v. WerbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Lampasona v. CapriottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.