Crowther v. District Court of Salt Lake County
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentEphraim Hanson, Justice
With much of what is stated in the prevailing opinion 1 concur. However, I am of the opinion that the writ should be made permanent. It is conceded that the affidavit and the notice of intention to take the depositions of Crowther and Jorgenson (two defendants in the main case) which were served February 8, 1935, on Mr. Hanson as attorney for Crowther and Jorgenson was not such service as required either of them to attend and submit to a compulsory examination.
In the case of Woolley v. Wight, 65 Utah 619, 238 P. 1114, 41 A. L. R. 433, this court had occasion to construe the statute relating…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hays' Administratrix v. McNealySupreme Court of Florida · 1878
- Woolley v. WightUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Fuller Buggy Co. v. WaldronNew York Supreme Court · 1906