Legal Opinion

Heffren v. Jayne

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Washington Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBusiurk, C. J.

This was an action brought by the appellees to compel the appellant to pay and deliver over certain moneys by him collected as an attorney at law. The complaint was as follows:

“ Eben C. Jayne and John K. Walker, partners in co-partnership, doing business under the firm name and style of Dr. D. Jayne & Son, complain of Horace Heffren, the defendant in the above entitled cause, and say that the said Horace Heffren is an attorney at law, and that he is now, and for many years past has been, practising his profession as such attorney in the courts of said county; that on or about the-day of May,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M'Cormick v. MalinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Bougher v. ScobeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Dawson v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Benjamin Hamby, Bankrupt v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. PoindexterWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. In Re GelsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  5. Fulton v. HammondDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API