Gay v. Ulrichs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement ■ of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Oode of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, J. :
The only question in this case is' whether in the foreclosure action brought by Charles R. Gay against Hannah Neumann and others the court acquired jurisdiction so that Rachel Segelofsky was bound by the judgment entered therein. Plaintiff attempted to make service upon her pursuant to the provisions of an order of publication. Defendant contends, first, that the form.of the order is insufficient, and, second,- that, if sufficient, its terms were not complied with. Unless deposit in the post office is dispensed with,.an order of publication must contain a direction that on or before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . SidorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- McCully v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1884
- Schenck v. McKieNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Morris v. MorangeNew York Supreme Court · 1863
- Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. CrowNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Von Der Heyde v. DitmarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- B. Berman, Inc. v. American Fruit Distributing Co. of CaliforniaNew York Supreme Court · 1921
- Korn v. LipmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Manzi v. MayerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913