Legal Opinion

Del Junco v. Hufnagel

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 2007No. B191456PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant V. Georges Hufnagel created a Web site that looked like the Web site of plaintiff and respondent Tirso Del Junco, Jr., M.D. Hufnagel’s Web site libeled Dr. Del Junco. Hufnagel appeals from the default judgment entered in favor of Dr. Del Junco. We find unpersuasive all contentions raised by Hufnagel except for the argument that the punitive damage award cannot stand.

In the published portions of this opinion (pts. I., II., DI.A., III.E., & IV.), we hold that Hufnagel’s counterfeit Web site contained defamatory statements and the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Baker v. Los Angeles Herald ExaminerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Franklin v. Dynamic Details, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Marciano v. Fahs (In Re Marciano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. In Re MarcianoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2010
  4. Crawford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Bowles, Jr. v. Constellation Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API