Legal Opinion
Territory v. Carland
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from First District, Custer County. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtGalbraith, J.
The appellant was indicted with two other persons for the statutory misdemeanor of conspiring *15together to cheat and defraud the county of Ouster. He was tried separately and convicted. The only question which the argument of the appellant presents for our consideration relates to the sufficiency of the indictment. The indictment was as follows, viz.: “ The grand jurors . . . do find and present that Harry II. Gerrish, Charles G. Cox and Willis W. Garland, on the 15th day of January. A. D. 1883, at the county of Ouster, in the territory of Montana, being evil-disposed and dishonest persons,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- State v. KeachSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
- State v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- Mullins v. Butte Hardware Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. HinckleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. MalishMontana Supreme Court · 1895