Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grogan v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Ltd.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1922No. Nos. 615 and 639Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice McKenna,

with whom concurred

Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice Clarke, dissenting.'

I am unable to concur in the opinion and judgment of the court.

*91The first case presents the right to transport intoxicating liquor in bond through the United States in accordance with certain rights given by the Revised Statutes and a treaty with Great Britain, notwithstanding the Eighteenth Amendment of the Constitution and its auxiliary legislation, the Volstead Act.

The second case concerns the transshipment of like liquor from one British ship to another British ship in New York harbor. In the first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. United States v. GudgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API