Watson v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co.

This is an action for an injunction against the defendants’ running their elevated railway in front of premises of plaintiff, and for damages. The only point that calls for particular attention is based upon the fact that the plaintiff acquired title by conveyance from one Love, after the *534defendants had taken the easement, which the plaintiff claims to be his property. On the trial, and on this appeal, the defendants claimed that there was no evidence that the railroad was constructed and putin operation there, without the consent of the owner, at the time of construction.

To this two answers…