Legal Opinion

Loeb & Brother v. Flash Bros.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Montgomery. Tried before the Hon. John A. Minnis. This action was brought by Flash Brothers, a mercantile partnership, doing business in New Orleans, against Loéb & Brother, a mercantile partnership doing business in Montgomery, to recover damages for the conversion of five hogsheads of sugar and ten barrels of molasses ; and was commenced on 27th January, 1879. The case was tried on issue joined on the plea of not guilty.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the City Court of Montgomery. Tried before the Hon. John A. Minnis. This action was brought by Flash Brothers, a mercantile partnership, doing business in New Orleans, against Loéb & Brother, a mercantile partnership doing business in Montgomery, to recover damages for the conversion of five hogsheads of sugar and ten barrels of molasses ; and was commenced on 27th January, 1879. The case was tried on issue joined on the plea of not guilty. The goods sued for were shipped by plaintiffs, from New Orleans, on or about the 26ih November, 1878, consigned to Munter & Brother, another…

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

— In instructing the jury as to the measure ot damages in this case — an action of trover — the City Court used the following language : “If the jury believe from the evidence that the sugar is worth now one cent per pound more, and the molasses ten cents per gallon more, than the prices stated in the account attached to the deposition of Flash, this additional, value should be added to the value stated in said account, and their verdict should be for the whole sum thus ascertained.” The prices stated in the account were the proximate value of the goods, when they went into the possession of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tanner's v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Bankhead v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Ewing v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  4. Conner & Johnson v. Allen & ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Graham v. LockhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McCormick & Richardson v. Joseph & AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Burks v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. LeGrand v. Eufaula National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Mazer v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. TapiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API