Legal Opinion
Clarke v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 12, 2012PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Substantial evidence supports respondent’s findings that petitioner violated relevant regulations, including refusing to cooperate and allow access to the home (18 NYCRR 416.15 [a] [10]), and by not having the proper number of caregivers present for each child under the age of two years old (18 NYCRR 416.8 [d] [2]), and that such violations placed the children’s health, safety and welfare in imminent danger (see Matter of Seemangal v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 49 AD3d 460 [2008]). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the Administrative Law…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Grady v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Seemangal v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Malak v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Lopez v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Matter of Lopez v. New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Simpson v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Malak v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.