Legal Opinion

Gidcome v. City of Nashville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The record contains two suits which were consolidated for hearing. Plaintiffs took a nonsuit as to all defendants except the City of Nashville.

Pearl Marjorie Gidcome in her suit seeks to recover damages from the City for injuries received dne to an alleged defective sidewalk. In the other snit her husband, Herbert Eugene Gidcome, sues for loss of services of his wife, etc.

The City duly filed its written motion to dismiss the suits because the statutory notice as a condition precedent to sue was defective in this:

“First, the notice on its face shows that the suit was instituted before notice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Memphis v. McCradyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Barribeau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. City of Knoxville v. FeldingTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Benson v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Batts v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Venstone Stone v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API