Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Jorski

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1944No. 29679PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

There is no issue in this cáse as to the validity of the provisions of the ordinance upon which the charge against the defendant was based. It contains substantially the same provisions as are embodied in Section 12606, General Code, in force and effect since. 1908. The application of long established and well settled principles of construction of penal provisions to the undisputed facts disclosed by the record is all that is required to determine the only question of law presented.

The trial judge, a jury having been waived, announced his findings at the close of the trial, wherein he stated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. State v. Associates Investment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. DickinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Pepper Pike v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. ConleyOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City of North Olmsted v. GallagherOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State v. BrookerOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API