Legal Opinion

Nimer v. Litchfield Township Board of Trustees

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2013No. 12-3309PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

There are two issues in this Younger abstention case. The first is whether Younger abstention applies to a claim seeking damages under 42 United States Code section 1983. The second is whether, after applying Younger and deciding to abstain, a district court may exercise its discretion and decide to dismiss such a damages claim. We hold that Younger abstention applies to a 42 United States Code section 1983 damages claim, but that a district court lacks the power to decide whether to dismiss such a damages claim. Instead, where, as here, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Henry Hill v. Rick SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. John Doe v. Univ. of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Goodwin v. County of SummitDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  4. Tennessee v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Xcaliber Int'l, Ltd. v. GerreganoDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API