Legal Opinion

Magyar v. Bishop

Massachusetts District Court

Decided March 3, 1982No. 8716Published

1Opinion of the Court

lodrey, I.

This is an action upon an account annexed for labor and materials furnished by the plaintiff in the construction of a retaining wall on the defendants’ property. The defendants counterclaimed for damages and *328attorney’s fees pursuant to G.L. c. 93A for the plaintiff’s unfair and deceptive practices in violation of G.L. c. 93, s.48.

The trial court found for the defendants on plaintiff’s complaint. Defendants’ counterclaim was allowed and damages were awarded thereon in the amount of $5,000.00 together with $464.00 costs and $1,250.00 in attorney’s fees.

The report discloses evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Ashapa v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Kravetz v. LipofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Louise Caroline Nursing Home, Inc. v. Dix Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Perma-Home Corp. v. NigroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API