Gentry v. Gentry

I concur in the Majority Opinion as written.

The Majority Opinion states on p. 934: “A majority of this Court does not find [KRS 403.190(2)(d) ] to be a clear statement of intent specifically to authorize such agreements.”

I am part of the minority who believes this statute intends to authorize prenuptial agreements.

KRS 403.190(2) provides:

“For the purpose of this chapter, ‘marital property’ means all property acquired by either spouse subsequent to the marriage except:(a) Property acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or descent;(b) Property acquired in exchange for property acquired before the…