Legal Opinion
Dinino v. D.A.T. Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about April 14, 1999, which granted plaintiffs’ post-trial motion to the extent of setting aside a jury verdict in defendants’ favor and directing a new trial, and denied defendants’ cross motion for a directed verdict upon their claims for contractual and common-law indemnification against defendants in the third-party actions, Ambassador Construction Co. and Irvess Construction Corp., unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendants’ cross motion to the extent of directing a conditional judgment in their favor upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Buccini v. 1568 Broadway AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Aragon v. 233 West 21st Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Freeman v. National Audubon Society, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Provenzano v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Srikishun v. EdyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Srikishun v. EdyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016