Legal Opinion

Nance v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 1, 1965No. [App. No. 108, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The petitioner Nance was tried and found guilty on an indictment charging only that he was a rogue and vagabond and was also tried and found guilty generally on three other indictments, each of four counts, charging, respectively, burglary from a storehouse, larceny of more than $500, being a rogue and vagabond, and receiving stolen goods. Judge Cullen gave the petitioner a one-year suspended sentence in the rogue and vagabond case, ten years on two of the other indictments to run concurrently, and four years on the third indictment to run consecutively to the first two. In 1958 Nance filed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. McCray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Sturgis v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Green v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Journigan v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Thomas v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API