Legal Opinion
Statesman Savings Holding Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 24, 1992No. Nos. 90-773C, 90-772CPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
OPINION
Plaintiffs Statesman Savings Holding Corp. (Statesman) and Glendale Federal Bank, FSB (Glendale) both acquired failing savings and loan institutions prior to the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA).1 Both Statesman and Glendale, like the plaintiffs in Winstar Corp. v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 112 (1990) (Winstar I), claim that the enactment of FIRREA breached their contracts with the government and effected a taking in violation of the fifth amendment. Presently before the court are Statesman’s and Glendale’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Hansen Bancorp, Inc., Elmer F. Hansen, Jr., and G. Eileen Hansen v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.