Legal Opinion

Stuard v. Vick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 6, 1928No. 462PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

The appellee, R. A. Vick, as administrator of the estate of J. B. Stuard, deceased, brought this suit against Candis Roberta Stuard, surviving widow of J. B. Stuard, for the purpose of canceling a deed to certain real estate, executed by J. B. Stuard to appellant on August 18, 1926. One of the grounds 'relied on by appellee for a cancellation of the deed was the mental incapacity of J. B. Stuard to execute a valid conveyance. That issue was submitted to the jury, but the jury found that J. B. Stuard had the mental capacity and ability to understand the nature and effect of his action and to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winkler v. CreekmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Sivalls Motor Co. v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dixie Motor Coach Corp. v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Collier v. Bankston-Hall Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Collins v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  4. Ivey v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Steine v. Hillcrest State Bank of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API