Legal Opinion

Helsel, Inc. v. City of Harrisburg

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1989No. 2131 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Judge.

Appellant, Helsel, Inc., a real estate broker, sought a declaratory judgment in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County-seeking a ruling that the City of Harrisburg's Business Privilege and Mercantile Tax is invalid as applied to appellant. The tax consists of millage imposed on every thousand dollars of gross receipts. Since there were no facts in dispute, appellant moved for summary judgment and the City filed a similar cross motion. The trial court ruled in favor of the City and appellant filed the instant appeal.

Both of appellant’s arguments are based on the fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Biscuit Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. F. J. Busse Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Allegheny Valley BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. National Biscuit Company v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. MurphyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Tax Review Board Ex Rel. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Rieders, Travis, Mussina, Humphrey & Harris v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC. v. MurphyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Rose View Manor, Inc. v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API