Legal Opinion
Mercantile National Bank of Hammond v. Underwood
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 2009No. 56A03-0902-CV-52PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
These parties and long-running litigation, which began in 1995, have been here before. In this appeal, we must determine whether a claim was "commenced" within the statute of limitations when it was initially improvidently filed as part of a proceeding supplemental. The answer is yes.
Appellants-plaintiffs Mercantile National Bank of Hammond, a corporation, as Trustee under the provisions of a certain Trust Agreement dated the 25th day of June, 1975, known as Trust Number 3346 (Mercantile), J.R. Construction Co., and Joseph Ramacci (collectively, the appellants),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Doughty v. State Department of Public WelfareIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Rollins Burdick Hunter of Utah, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Ball State UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rose v. Mercantile National Bank of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SALSBERY PORK PRODUCERS, INC. v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Mercantile National Bank v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Gumwood HP Shopping Partners, L.P. v. Simon Property Group, Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Neurology and Pain Management Associates P.C. v. BuninDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.