Forvendel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLeblanc, J.
hln the instant appeal, defendant-appellant, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) seeks review of the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Brandon Forvendel. For the foregoing reasons, we find that the trial court did not manifestly err in finding that Mr. Forvendel could recover under both his own and his mother’s uninsured motorist insurance policies. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Factual & Procedural History
On July 19, 2013, Mr. Forvendel was involved in a three-car accident while driving a vehicle he owned and which was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Housley v. CeriseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brandon Forvendel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018