Legal Opinion

State v. Garner

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 17, 1996No. 96-0168-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchudsqn, J.

Andrew James Garner appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his guilty plea, for burglary and possession of burglarious tools, and from the trial court's order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the trial court violated his right to due process of law by denying his motion to suppress identification "without holding a hearing, taking evidence, or developing any factual basis for that denial."

As the parties acknowledge, this appeal presents two related issues of first impression: (1) whether an evidentiary hearing is always required when a defendant moves to suppress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Watkins v. SowdersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. WolvertonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. VelezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. SamuelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. RadderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API