Legal Opinion

Grant v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1993No. 34A02-9203-CR-105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

On November 12, 1991, a jury found Farrell Donald Grant guilty of Conspiracy to Commit Dealing in Cocaine or a Narcotic Drug, a Class A felony. 1 Grant presents several issues upon appeal which are restated as follows:

I. Whether the amended information sufficiently sets forth the elements of the offense charged;

II. whether the trial court erred in denying Grant's discovery requests;

III. whether the trial court erred in permitting the State to present the concept of "all reasonable doubt" during voir dire;

IV. whether the trial court erred in refusing Grant's tendered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Yates v. AikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Marsillett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lahr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Lampitok v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Barber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rita v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Garner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API