Legal Opinion

Bahlau v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 26, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts.) It is sought to uphold the decree of the chancery .court .-upon the authority of White v. Loughborough, 125 Ark. 57. In that case the court upheld the validity of a statute providing for the annexation of territory to an improvement district, and held that the assent of the property owners in the original district to the annexation was not required, because no additional burdens would be placed upon their property, and that the cost of making the additional improvement must be .borne by the property within the limits of the annexed territory.

That case does…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. LoughboroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. SeymourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Pledger v. SoltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API