Legal Opinion

Stahl v. Panarama Rest Care

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1990No. 89-CA-2430-WCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILHOIT, Judge.

The appellant, Flossie Mae Stahl, was found to be totally occupationally disabled; 25 percent of the disability was attributed to a 1986 work-related injury to her hip and back and 75 percent was excluded from compensation as prior active disability. The appellant appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Board. The administrative law judge (ALJ) who rendered the opinion and award was not named as a respondent in the appellant’s notice of appeal, although the certificate of service reflected that the AU was served with a copy of the notice of appeal. Upon a motion filed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF RICHMOND v. FloodKentucky Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Milligan v. Schenley Distillers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  3. Johnson v. CorrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Compton v. American Commercial Barge Line Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. General Electric Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hutchins v. General Electric Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API