Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of New Smyrna Beach v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 8, 1960No. 30300Published

1ConcurrenceDrew, Justice

In voting to deny the petition for rehearing in Easterlin v. City of New Port Richey, Fla., 105 So.2d 361, 363, I endeavored to make it quite clear that I concurred in the majority opinion prepared for the Court by Mr. Justice Thomas because of my conclusion that the charter of the City of New Port Richey, as I construed its pertinent provisions, prohibited the City from issuing bonds for the construction of a municipal lighting or water plant without an affirmative vote of its registered freeholders at an election held for that purpose, and I expressed the fixed view, basing my conclusion on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. State v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. North Shore Bank v. Town of SurfsideSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Easterlin v. City of New Port RicheySupreme Court of Florida · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API