Ochoa v. State

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of delivery of marihuana and, after appellant pleaded true to one enhancement allegation, assessed his punishment at 15 years.

In one ground of error, appellant contends that his conviction should be reversed because his retained trial counsel failed to object to inadmissible evidence upon which he was convicted.

On March 14,1985, two City of Pasadena undercover officers arrested appellant in Houston for the instant offense. Earlier that day, the Pasadena officers had arranged to buy 10 pounds of marihuana for $6,000 from Consuela Delgado,…