Legal Opinion

Lasater v. House

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2004No. 18A04-0305-CV-223Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Gene and Carolyn Lasater filed their "Amended Complaint to Contest the Last Will and Testament of Opal M. Pullen and Void the Transfer of Non-Probate Bank Accounts" against Donald House, Sr., personally and as personal representative of Opal Pullen's estate, Mabel Dunn, Pricilla Studebaker, Gaston United Methodist Church, Masonic Lodge #650, Theodore Coffman, Mutual Federal Savings Bank as trustee for Billy Dunn, and Judy Clemens (collectively "the Estate"). The Lasaters allege in their complaint that Pullen's will was the product of undue influence.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Torres v. County of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Roach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McGrew v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API