In re the Personal Restraint of Carlstad
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Monti Carlstad, who is incarcerated at a state prison near Spokane, handed his personal restraint petition to prison officials for mailing five days before the expiration of the one-year deadline. However, the petition was not filed at this court until one day after the deadline. Carlstad argues that his petition was timely filed according to the federal mailbox rule, which deems pro se incarcerated defendants’ pleadings as “filed” when they are properly deposited into the prison mailing system. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 271, 108 S. Ct. 2379, 101 L. Ed. 2d 245 (1988). We hold that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re CarlstadWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. McLeanWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Allen Watkins & Janis Clark, Appellant's V. Esa ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Allen Watkins & Janis Clark, Appellant's V. Esa ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024