Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2008No. 103972PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The central issue in this case is what remedy exists for a postconviction petitioner whose trial attorney failed to file a notice of direct appeal. The State appeals the decision of the appellate court, affirming the circuit court of Cook County’s order allowing petitioner Vernon Ross to file a late notice of appeal. No. 1 — 05—2806 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On January 18, 1999, just before…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. SalemIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API