Legal Opinion
People v. De Curtis
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants were charged with keeping a disorderly house during 1964 and 1965, in violation of section 1146 , of the former Penal Law, and of vagrancy, in violation of former section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Section 1146 of the former Penal Law provided in pertinent part: “ § 1146. Keeping disorderly houses. Whosoever shall keep or maintain a house of ill-fame or assignation of any description or a place for the encouragement or practice by persons of lewdness, fornication, unlawful sexual intercourse or for any other indecent or disorderly act or obscene purpose therein or any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kaiser v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. Betts, Hirsch, Cohen, HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- People v. KellyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ZappacostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Stephens v. LeFevreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- People v. CorteseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988