Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Continental Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1910No. 2,010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In.Error to the Circuit Court of the United States, for the Middle District of Tennessee. Action by Rouisa Nelson against the Continental Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff fpr less than the amount demanded, and .she brings -error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action upon a fire insurance policy. The material facts are these:

'The plaintiff, in the year' 1899, was the owner of a lot in Nashville, Tenn., fronting about 42 feet on North Market street and running back 211 feet to Front street, and having thereon an old two-story building. One Pilcher owned a lot adjoining plaintiff’s, lot on the north (likewise extending from North Market street to Front street); Pilcher’s lot' having thereon a three-story brick building, the- south line of which was the north line of plaintiff’s lot, and the south wall of the Pilcher…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Columbian Insurance Co. of Alexandria v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Monteleone v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  5. Hall v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central States Fire Insurance v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Pappas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  3. Hudson Mfg. Co. v. New York Underwriters' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API