Legal Opinion

Castillo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 1991No. 90-2802PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Chief Judge Baker labelled the behavior of plaintiff, a doctor, and his counsel “the most outrageous example of evasion and obfuscation that I have seen in years,” and “a deliberate frustration of defendants’ attempt to secure discovery.” He sanctioned the doctor and both of his counsel, holding one in civil contempt. Thereafter Judge Baker dismissed the doctor’s case with prejudice saying he was “truly sorry to be brought to this situation” finding it “most distasteful” and “an unfortunate duty.” The doctor appeals, represented by attorneys James G. Walker…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David KreylingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, and United Nuclear CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. NAACP, Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bernard Brown-Bey v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Godlove v. BambergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guillermo Castillo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API