Rutledge v. Rutledge
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
This action of the plaintiff wife for custody and support of a minor child, equitable division of the marital property, alimony, and other property arrangements, was brought under G. L. c. 208, § 37, second par. (modification of foreign judgment). A judge of the Probate Court in Middlesex County denied the motion of the defendant husband to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction. We agree with the judge.1
*538For purposes of the motion, the situation may be described as follows. The parties were married in Decatur, Georgia, in 1956. In 1976 they came to live in Acton, Massachusetts, and a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lohman v. LohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Miller v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Akinci-Unal v. UnalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Anderson v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995