Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1987No. 84, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This appeal raises the question of whether use of the short form indictment specified by Maryland Code (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol.) Art. 27, § 616 to charge all forms of murder adequately protects a defendant’s constitutional right of fair notice and due process. We hold that it does.

The Appellant, Arthur Ross, Jr., was indicted jointly with Robert Clark on charges of “feloniously, wilfully and of their deliberately premeditated malice aforethought,” killing and murdering Millicent Yvonne Johnson, and of robbery of Ms. Johnson with a dangerous and deadly weapon and related charges.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Neusbaum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API