Legal Opinion
Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2015No. 09-99012, 09-99013PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Jesse James Andrews appeals from the district court’s denial of all but one of the claims raised in his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The state cross-appeals the district court’s grant of relief on Andrews’s claim that his counsel’s assistance was ineffective at the penalty phase of his capital murder trial. We dismiss as unripe the claim the district court certified for appeal, and deny Andrews’s motion to expand the certificate of appealability to include uncertified claims. We reverse its grant of relief on the ineffective…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reynaldo Ayala v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Ernest Jones v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jesse Andrews v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- James Hardy v. Kevin Chappell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- James Hardy v. Kevin Chappell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.