Legal Opinion

Smith v. Field

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1882No. 213PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for the' Northern District of Illinois. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

In 1878 the defendant in the court below was collector of customs for the port of Chicago, and this action is brought to recover from him the amount of certain, duties alleged to have been illegally imposed in that year upon goods of the plaintiffs. It appears that the plaintiffs imported into the Uni'ted States, from France,- certain articles invoiced as “ white linen torchon laces and' insertings ; ” tha, they were brought by steamship to New York, thence transported to Chicago under internal transportation bonds, and there entered; that the defendant, as collector, decided that the goods…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SehlbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. Wm. J. Matheson & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  3. In re HerrmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
  4. Howgate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1895
  5. Muser v. RobertsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API