Legal Opinion

Petersen v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1930No. 27311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action by contractors to recover a balance due them on their contract to construct Grace street storm sewer in Omaha for $124,029.20. H. J. Petersen and James Jensen were contractors and are plaintiffs. The city of Omaha is defendant. Claims for the unpaid balance due on the contract were presented by plaintiffs to the city council and disallowed. They appealed to the district court where a judgment was entered in their favor for $2,801.49. This sum is composed entirely of interest amounting to $842.33 on delayed payments as the work progressed and of an item, listed in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jensen v. RomighNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. New Masonic Temple Ass'n v. Globe Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. City of Scottsbluff v. Western Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API