Cumbie v. Goldsmith
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Richard and Daniele Cumbie own a small parcel of land at the western end of a private way, Wyer’s Lane. The lane provides the only access.to their parcel. Parcels owned by Sybil Goldsmith and Robert Ep-ple are across Wyer’s Lane from each other and abut Wyer’s Lane and the Cumbies’ parcel. 3 At trial, the parties stipu lated that the Cumbies “have, as appurtenant to their property, a prescriptive right over the whole of Wyer’s Lane from their property to North Center Street, that right being to pass and repass.” The Cumbies now seek to extend their prescriptive use by placing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. Russell Management, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Emery v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Lawless v. TrumbullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Stefanick v. FortonaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Zimmerman v. FinkelsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Nylander v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Estes v. DeMelloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Lane v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Barlow v. Chongris & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.