Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union

Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act

Decided December 21, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 83-16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WEINER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Once again we revisit the consequences resulting from the passage by Congress of the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981 (“NRSA”). On October 7, 1983, plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) filed a complaint against the United Transportation Union (“UTU”), the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”), the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (“BLE”) and their general chairmen. These unions had each sought to arbitrate certain claims for job protection arising out of Conrad’s decisions to abandon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1982
  2. United Transp. Union v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1982
  3. RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES'ASS'N v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1983
  4. Ry. Lab. Executives'ass'n v. Grand Trunk Wr Co.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1984
  5. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. HindsSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penn Cent. Corp. v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API