Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bergeron v. Busch

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1998No. Docket 199130Published

1DissentHoekstra, J.

I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion sets forth the three requirements of res judicata. That two of the three have been met is not disputed. First, the state and federal suits shared the same parties and privities. Second, the dismissal of the federal claims by the federal court constituted a ruling on the merits. The analysis *629in this case turns on the remaining third requirement, i.e., whether the claims raised in the state litigation were or could have been resolved in the federal litigation. The precise issue in this case requires us to determine the preclusive effect of a federal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Nwosun v. General Mills Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API