State v. Howard
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 110,439 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CAMERON HOWARD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In reviewing the granting or denial of a motion to suppress evidence, an appellate court determines whether the factual findings underlying the trial court's suppression decision are supported by substantial competent evidence. The appellate court does not reweigh the evidence or reassess the credibility of the witnesses. The ultimate legal conclusion drawn from those factual findings is reviewed under a de novo standard. 2. The Fourth Amendment to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.