Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 2017No. 110439Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 110,439 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CAMERON HOWARD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In reviewing the granting or denial of a motion to suppress evidence, an appellate court determines whether the factual findings underlying the trial court's suppression decision are supported by substantial competent evidence. The appellate court does not reweigh the evidence or reassess the credibility of the witnesses. The ultimate legal conclusion drawn from those factual findings is reviewed under a de novo standard. 2. The Fourth Amendment to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API